I guess I have a different view of posting the NYT. Most if not all articles of the NYT today (and many days) are posted by E. Pluribus Unum. While that is fine and well within the rules, I have to ask what do they add to the conversation. I know, know your enemy, but we all know that the NYT is nothing but propaganda for the Left and their articles add nothing to intelligent discourse and are nothing but spin, propaganda and outright lies. We know what they are going to print before they even write it. So, I guess, to each his own.
What does it add to the of conversation to have all these Freepers going on and on about how awful the Democrats are, when any true MAGA supporter with half a brain can see that the GOP are every bit as much a part of the destruction of the American dream and American freedoms? And that our two party system is a complete and total fake wrestling Kabuki farce.
It’s every bit as pointless, clueless, and redundant. I was one of the many fools who used to believe that the GOP was genuinely better than the Democrats. I stuck up for Bush and thought McCain would’ve been so much better than Obama.
I’m now embarrassed by it. But plenty of people here are just as shameless as the NY Times in their devotion to stale old irrelevant narratives that they can’t seem to let go of.
What does it add to the of conversation to have all these Freepers going on and on about how awful the Democrats are, when any true MAGA supporter with half a brain can see that the GOP are every bit as much a part of the destruction of the American dream and American freedoms?
It’s every bit as pointless, clueless, and redundant. I was one of the many fools who used to believe that the GOP was genuinely better than the Democrats. I stuck up for Bush and thought McCain would’ve been so much better than Obama.
I’m now embarrassed by it. But plenty of people here are just as shameless as the NY Times in their devotion to stale old irrelevant narratives that they can’t seem to let go of.