Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg

True, another point that was made by a rhetoric teacher of mine in college freshman rhetoric was and is that each individual has his or her own writing style. That woman was so good at spotting it that she said she knew a paper was written by a given individual once she had seen two or three other papers written by the same person. That’s the problem with AI from the standpoint of the cheater. It’s not going to be able to mimic the cheater’s writing style unless it has a good sample of the cheater’s actual work. If you doubt the point I make about consistency of writing style, just look at Pres. Trump’s tweets. They express lots of different ideas but in the same basic, highly individualistic way.


39 posted on 10/19/2024 10:51:54 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: libstripper

Agreed.

AI now has a very mechanistic style—tends to easily drift into cliches.

On various Reddit groups where I post from time to time I have accused others of flunking the Turing test.

(Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test)

Curiously none of them have argued the point!


Where the smarter AI developers are going to get around this problem is to create AI programs that intentionally fail—and have to figure out what they did wrong.

That creates a template where the AI learns how to learn instead of just mimicking what it has seen elsewhere.


41 posted on 10/19/2024 10:58:15 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson