No, they're pretty sharp ... trying to protect their client. That's their job.
“No, they’re pretty sharp ... trying to protect their client. That’s their job.”
This is one of those “what if the shoe was on the other foot” situations. Unfortunately they actually do have a strong argument for a change of venue in defense of their client in this case. So does Trump with the judges attacking him in his cases. Cannon has even ruled on court cases in her court in favor of Trump himself. I think she would be totally straight up and handle it objectively, but If this situation is not a good reason for requesting recusal or change of venue I don’t know what is.