Posted on 10/12/2024 11:00:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Many at FR read these headlines and after a couple maybe 10, 20, even nearly 25 years of it, know straight off how to re name the source publication in order to interpret content for whatever reason, economy of time, knowing the enemy, whatever it is there is no fear in seeing what leftists are saying
Personally, I took my enlightenment of the NYT as an anti conservative at levels of ignorance, subversion, collusion and lies, the most destructive apologized-for on the bottom of page A 16, the netherworld reserved for defense attorneys
I confess to enjoying the word puzzles, in the words of a family friend hailing from her spot in the tony NY suburb of Greenwich, this BLEEP rag, the clues of which even earning that nickname
I see the NYT byline here and I call it the BS Times and read on or skip over accordingly, but I never view it as the paper of record that was flung on our doorstep growing up in our own tiny NY suburban spot
My parents managed to be quietly conservative and wise in most ways despite the BS Times.
It’s a lesson in being impermeable to brainwashing
“Bullshit”
As everything that comes from the NYT. I call it the BS Times
Rebunked must be a word, right?
“Juvenile writing, laughable logic, and nonexistent morals. Typical journalists.”
Well, typical NYT political journalists. They’re the best at it
They are illogical
I am enjoying reading them now because you can smell their desperation.
“I am enjoying reading them now because you can smell their desperation.”
It is pure entertainment. It’s amusing
Yeah sure, NYT…
Never disbelieve anything until the New York Times reports on it.
The Seven: Sure! What do you want us to do?
/overactive imagination
Took three journalists to write rumors.
The New York Times = National Inquirer
Trump has meeting with UFO pilots............................
lol. Trump is doing anything but ranting. The guy is planning rallies in Deep Blue strongholds. That doesn’t strike me as desperation or ranting.
But what am I saying, anonymous sources are super dooper credible.
Whether he ranted or not is his prerogative. If I were he, I would want to know who the blabber mouths were, and deal with them accordingly. But that’s just how I would do it.
If I only had a bird cage.
From the NYT? Well, ok, since its fairness and objectivity is second only to CBS.
NYT
NOT YET TRUTH (NYT)
“WHO WOULD BELIEVE THESE KNOWN LIARS?”
Psychopaths who align with media that calms the voices in their head(s)...
Unfortunately, there is a dearth of Spiritually Sane *Men* to counteract the proliferation of *crazy*, which has organized with a tribal obsession with identifying anyone that “triggers” self-awareness the enemy...
The care no if it obliterates their families, communities & nation.
On top of being easy to manipulate, they have “No Shame” & “Anything Goes” in their quest to be “normal”, though deep-down they know they are *freaks*...
The UniParty GlobalCap Empire relies on these agents of chaos to prevent anything like the Sons of Liberty or Tea Party from Uniting against “Their” rape, pillage, plunder & butchery.
EOT
NYT j-urinalists are just bitter and angry that their rhetoric has not succeeded in President Trump’s murder.
Nothing in the article can be substantiated as more than their wet dream fantasies.
As usual, NYT produces content with no more value than used toilet paper.
People are dumber for being exposed to it.
“Rebunked”. LOL! Totally stealing. Brilliant!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.