I don’t see how democRATs fail to see how unimpressive she is.
“ I don’t see how democRATs fail to see how unimpressive she is.”
When all you know how to do is pull the lever fr a Democrat, this is what you get.
Because she’s heavily marketed. That’s what they do with their Soros money. It’s poured into handling, marketing, and creating a public image. She could drive across the country backwards and the media would still be talking about her JOY.
“ I don’t see how democRATs fail to see how unimpressive she is.
”
That’s not what they care anout
“I don’t see how democRATs fail to see how unimpressive she is.”
Satan blinds their eyes.
Like the scene in the first “Left Behind”, where the anti-Christ’s goons shot a tone of people in an auditorium, but nobody saw it except the Christians.
They did see it. In the primaries. Where she flamed out spectacularly. Dims just don’t care when the party says that’s your girl. That plus Orange man bad.
Observers have so frequently described her ramblings as “word salad” that it’s trite, although still apt. Ben Shapiro prefers “word coleslaw.”
There’s more objective data. She attended a middling university (86 out of 436 USA universities) and a mediocre law school (82 out of 196). She didn’t distinguish herself. She wasn’t a valedictorian nor an editor of a legal journal.
She failed the bar exam on her first attempt. Her entry into politics was not due to out-shining her peers but rather her . . . ahem . . . relationship with a married man, Willie Brown, then the Speaker of the California State Assembly and 31 years her senior. (For those in the Kamala IQ decile, that means that Brown, then 60, was thirty-one years older than Kamala, then 29.) Do we think Brown chose her as his paramour for her scintillating conversation?
This should have come up in the debate.