I also surmise that part of why the British royal family was so hostile to Dianna's romance with Dodi was that, due to comprehensive security surveillance, they knew about his father Mohammed Al Fayed's predations and feared that William and Harry could be drawn into that kind of life.
Within limits, the British public will tolerate sexual misconduct among Britain's royals and aristocrats, but not when it extends to royals being pals with dissolute foreigners and preying upon ordinary and often vulnerable women. That is why Prince Andrew is in such disgrace for his ties with Epstein and Virginia Giuffre while Charles is now King with the notorious sexual climber Camilla at his side as Queen.
If Dianna had married Dodi and William or Harry had been drawn into Muhammed Al Fayed's orbit, the British monarchy would now be teetering on the brink in the current round of stories.
I’d like to see more corroboration kind of like why Epstein’s ‘client’ list is never released but you make an interesting conclusion
By the way, it says in one of the stories at Link I posted Harrods are paying out compensation and settling with some accusers.
Curious timing all this.
If the doctor is accused and involved then there can be some corroboration same with countless staff who they say protected him.
The doctor has actually been referred to her professional body so we’ll see what happens.
I find it strange you can just accuse ONE person in orchestrating all this who has passed away .
There is no way you can assault women on that scale without help over the years in which case there will be more evidence and perhaps some kind of trail there?
I’m no detective...