they weren’t just at Bidens home they were at a university program funded by China.
I’ve read Biden had stashed documents at 5 to 7 locations.
I just did Google search for “how many places did biden keep classified documents”
I got plenty of responses, but all AP, WaPo, NPR, Politifact, Time.com, Wikipedia, factcheck.org, PBS, CBS, CNN, BBC. Not one worthy source.
I had AI (via the tool ‘fabric’) generate a summary ...
ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY:
Former CIA lawyer Joseph Sweeney discusses his book on government corruption and weaponization of agencies against Trump.
MAIN POINTS:
1. Sweeney worked for CIA for 25 years, handling classified information cases and high-profile mishandling cases.
2. He explains differences in how Trump and Biden’s classified document cases were handled, showing clear bias.
3. FBI affidavit for Mar-a-Lago raid contained misleading information about presidential authority over classified documents.
4. Sweeney criticizes weaponization of DOJ/FBI against Trump through selective leaks and biased investigations.
5. He argues Trump did not violate laws regarding classified documents, unlike Biden who hoarded documents for decades.
6. Sweeney discusses propaganda efforts by media to shape public perception of investigations against Trump.
7. He explains how presidential power over classified information stems from commander-in-chief authority.
8. Sweeney criticizes appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel, saying he doesn’t meet DOJ regulations.
9. He argues political bias has infected career officials at DOJ/FBI, not just political appointees.
10. Sweeney recommends reforms to prevent future weaponization of agencies against political opponents.
TAKEAWAYS:
1. Government agencies have been weaponized against Trump in unprecedented ways.
2. Media and DOJ/FBI have coordinated to shape public perception through selective leaks and biased reporting.
3. Clear double standard in handling of Trump vs. Biden classified document cases.
4. Presidential authority over classified information is broader than commonly understood.
5. Reforms are needed to prevent future abuse of government power for political purposes.