Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DIRTYSECRET

Problem goes back to the Constitution and lack of clear text on ‘numbers’.

I would say this...if we go to ‘11’....why settle on that number being the ‘end’?

You might as well double down and say it should be 50 judges (1 from each state, with the judge required to have residence in his home state), and you draw a random 7 or 9 judges from the hat each time a case comes up. I’d even go as far as having each state (not the President or the House) determine their state supreme court judge.


6 posted on 09/26/2024 11:07:33 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

The ability to “pack” the Supreme Court is a “hole” in the Constitution that needs to be plugged. I would definitely favor an amendment capping the number of judges at nine.


21 posted on 09/27/2024 5:49:24 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson