I agree with you.
Sometimes the courts seem so obtuse to the people arguing before them. No, not every case needs to be re-tried. But when the prosecution shows up and says, “Maybe we did this guy wrong” I think it warrants examination.
I am not sure if the courts did that, or if they just blew it off. I also don’t understand by the governor didn’t hold up the process for a review.
Forensic evidence is compelling. In some cases, it slams the door shut on the defense. We should be looking at old cases and updating the forensics to see if they hold up. (Or point in another direction.)