Replies

If they had provided the source then I could check them and it out and confirm the source to be good or not. By not providing source, monetized or not, then your claims are just so much hot air.

So, you then become the fact-checker and many people will question your qualifications for that task. Whether from 'reliable' or unreliable sources, you then become the 'reliable' or unreliable source There is no single source that contains the entire truth, not when people will disagree with YOUR facts or the facts from any other source. Which is the constant state of information and disinformation on the internet.

But, do try your luck. Your fact-checking may prove to be valuable. But, "WE OUT HERE WILL DECIDE". ;) Can't win for trying, can you. ;)

I think we are on the same side here, my point is not to prove or disprove anyone. It is for me to decide with the information I have or am given.

Finding “truth” is a process, and at best I can find myself satisfied with the my research