To: Morgana
Are these nuclear weapons something we should be concerned about? No, these destroyed nuclear weapons need no longer concern the West - or anybody else.
The nuclear arsenal of the aggressive autocrat V. Putin has now been reduced by two. I.e., there are now two fewer nuclear-tipped missiles aimed at, say, a U.S. military base. Grounds for celebration!
Regards,
8 posted on
09/21/2024 9:48:31 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: alexander_busek
I'm glad you have so much faith in Biden and Harris. I'm sure they know what they are doing. Don't think we aren't vulnerable right now. We are more vulnerable than ever before. Iran and the Houthi rebels can cause a lot of damage with Russian missiles. It won't be hard for terrorist to infiltrate our country through our open borders to carry out major attacks. Starting a world war over a corrupt cesspool like Ukraine is ridiculous. The corrupt billionaires and deep state will sacrifice as many lives as it takes to save their laundromat.
11 posted on
09/21/2024 10:03:03 PM PDT by
Rdct29
(The Democrats Are The New Nazi Party )
To: alexander_busek
To: alexander_busek
Nuclear weapons contain nuclear material. The weapon may “be destroyed” but that nuclear material has to go somewhere. NATO countries will get hit first, which is a comforting thought. 🫤
To: alexander_busek
Not really.
If they move to launch on warning for even a conventional drone strike we all end up paying for Ukraine’s stupidity.
You want to know how close we came when both sides were on launch on warning? Read about Able Archer 83, and how one Russian colonel saved us all.
That’s what can happen when we are on a hair trigger.
19 posted on
09/21/2024 11:08:46 PM PDT by
Reverend Wright
( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
52 posted on
09/22/2024 6:02:25 AM PDT by
Who is John Galt?
("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson