Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana; bitt

There was an explosion (not nuclear). There was damage.

By satellite imagery, the damage is revealed to include a portion of the site, not the nuclear missile bunkers. Those are protected more than the surrounding buildings anyway, so a drone strike would not be expected to penetrate the SATAN-2 silos.

The damage to the facility and munitions stored there was significant, but insufficient to change the course of the war. The estimates of loss of munitions range from 2 days worth to two weeks worth - nobody knows exactly - based on what the Russian Ministry of Defense has previously said it expends per day. But RUssia has almost limitless production and access to munitions so it doesn’t change anything in the war.

NATO/Deep State wants to provoke all out war with Russia and if it takes striking nuclear bunkers, they’ll do it.


55 posted on 09/22/2024 7:07:43 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

I thought just that one strike on the 18th was estimated to destroy 2-3 months worth of Russian armament.


60 posted on 09/22/2024 7:59:58 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

What would we do if Russia supplied, directed and supervised the Venezuelan or Cuban attacks against nuclear bases and depots in the USA?

Russia is being remarkably patient.


64 posted on 09/22/2024 9:12:00 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson