Oh look! Somebody else who struggles with the English language. Look, you silly goobers tried this nonsense back in 2009(?), and the Ankeny Court, and the Ankeny Appeals Court both told you the same thing. That the 14th Amendment was simply the embodiment of 5 or 6 centuries of prior English and American law, regarding natural born citizenship. Those courts and others, also told you that your silly theories were just some nonsense that you pulled out of your rear ends.
But you didn’t listen then, and you won’t listen now, because you are insane. You are the same kind of insane, that Sovereign Citizens and transexuals are, and flat-earthers, and moon-landing deniers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm_08HhGYJ0
A natural born citizen needs no grant of government for citizenship.
Playing by Alinsky's Rules For Radicals is no longer an effective tactic. It has long run its course.
You *WISH* they were pulled out of someone's rear end. The trouble you have is that there is *EVIDENCE* supporting this view. Evidence even the courts have acknowledged in the past. ("...some authorities...")
Evidence is a pesky thing, isn't it? People like you try to wish it away, yet it persists.
If your theory was correct, there would be no such evidence, but there is.
How can there possibly be evidence contradicting your claim?
But there is.
