Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the PCR test has killed millions – and is STILL killing!
expose-news.com ^ | August 13, 2024 | Rhoda Wilson

Posted on 09/01/2024 2:53:00 PM PDT by ransomnote

The PCR test is responsible for more deaths than any test in history. It has been the weapon of choice for those determined to create fear, to justify pointless and damaging lockdowns, harmful and futile mask wearing and toxic and useless vaccinations.

“Anyone who has ever used the PCR test as a diagnostic aid is a criminal and should be regarded as such,” Dr. Vernon Coleman writes.

The late Kary Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction (“PCR”) test in 1984-1985 for research purposes to amplify specific DNA or RNA sequences for genetic analysis. It is a DNA amplification technique, not a diagnostic tool.

Nevertheless, in the early 2000s PCR-based tests began to be adopted for diagnostic purposes, particularly for detecting infectious diseases such as HIV, tuberculosis and influenza. 

The covid-19 “pandemic” accelerated PCR test development and its widespread use. The first PCR-based covid tests were approved for emergency use in late 2019 to early 2020 to detect the genetic material, or fragments of RNA, of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that is said to cause covid-19. 

Even when done properly – using gene sequences which are uniquely specific to a particular pathogen, correct procedures (e.g. low amplification cycles) and correct sampling and testing conditions (e.g. samples that are not cross-contaminated from other samples or sources) – PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool.  They cannot detect whether someone has an infection, they can only detect genetic material which could have been present in the person or animal’s body for decades.


Kary Mullis, Inventor of PCR Test – “PCR is not a reliable test for viruses

PCR tests are not only ineffective for diagnosing whether someone has an infection, but they are also dangerous. In the following, Dr. Coleman argues that the PCR is the most lethal medical test in history.



By Dr. Vernon Coleman

The PCR test is responsible for more deaths than any test in history. It was a crucial weapon in misdiagnosing millions of patients. I recently reprinted an article I first wrote three years ago. But there is more to know about the PCR test which I will, in this article, show to be not only worthless but to be responsible for the deaths of millions.

Since the flu of 2019 was selected to be marketed and promoted as a major threat to mankind, and the fake covid pandemic first became a weapon in the manufactured war driving us remorselessly towards “Net Zero” and the “Great Reset,” the PCR test has been the weapon of choice for those determined to create fear, to justify pointless and damaging lockdowns, harmful and futile mask wearing and toxic and useless vaccinations.

It was always known that the PCR test didn’t work and wasn’t of any value in detecting the over-promoted and oversold version of the annual flu known as covid-19.

MORE AT LINK: https://expose-news.com/2024/08/13/how-the-pcr-test-has-killed-millions/

 



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 5g; aliens; believeanythingcrowd; bigfootisilluminati; bigpharma; bigpharmatrolls; clickbait4qtards; clickbucks; covid; crazynonsense; dailyfakenews; dumbingdownfr; embarrassingnonsense; engagementfarming; fakenewssource; freepathonkiller; frheldforransom; gulliblefreepers; justtheflubro; mazzdelusion; mentalillness; nutjobs; pcrtest; qvirus; r; ransomkingoffakenews; ransomnut; reptilianshadowgov; uttergarbage; whypostthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 09/01/2024 2:53:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Blaming the test is like blaming guns for murder. It’s not the test that’s the problem, it’s how it’s used for detection of SARS-CoV-2.


2 posted on 09/01/2024 3:01:45 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

How many people went on AZT over a PCR test result? I seem to remember it HIV virus in a supposed AIDS patient as being the equivalent of a BB in a 747.


3 posted on 09/01/2024 3:03:08 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts (“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: We should have set up ambushes...paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled How the PCR test has killed millions – and is STILL killing!, Carry_Okie wrote:

Blaming the test is like blaming guns for murder. It’s not the test that’s the problem, it’s how it’s used for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

In the article, Dr. Coleman makes it clear he holds those knowingly using this invalid test are responsible.


4 posted on 09/01/2024 3:04:10 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

From a family of Doctors and Engineers. Verify their supposed science before you trust it. You life will depend on it. Be blessed brothers and sisters!


5 posted on 09/01/2024 3:05:33 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose (Praise Hashem, for his restoration of all things! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks ‘note


6 posted on 09/01/2024 3:12:36 PM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

The thing with doctors, they bury their mistakes.


7 posted on 09/01/2024 3:15:00 PM PDT by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The purpose was to collect DNA for data harvesting.


8 posted on 09/01/2024 3:18:49 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (I'm voting for the convicted felon with the pierced ear. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Blaming the test is like blaming guns for murder. It’s not the test that’s the problem, it’s how it’s used for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Good post sir. PCR is a cyclic test, in effect you are repeating the test multiple times in a test. It is a function of repeating the DNA sequence until it can be detected. The first cycles are pretty damn accurate. With multiple cycles it becomes more and more inaccurate. It repeats mistakes and makes them greater.

The individual that devised this method was brilliant but sadly passed. He disowned the test as it is being used today. I trust the innovator. He got a Nobel Prize for his works.

9 posted on 09/01/2024 3:24:09 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“ The first PCR-based covid tests were approved for emergency use in late 2019 to early 2020 ”

Before COVID was here the PCR test were approved.


10 posted on 09/01/2024 3:24:16 PM PDT by Gary from Dayton (Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what was burdening before )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gary from Dayton

*was


11 posted on 09/01/2024 3:25:17 PM PDT by Gary from Dayton (Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what was burdening before )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Complete horse shit.


12 posted on 09/01/2024 3:28:31 PM PDT by Kozak (Слава Україні Герояам Слава. RuZZia is a terrorist state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“Brought to you by Pfizer”


13 posted on 09/01/2024 3:30:23 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

nothing like sticking
a Swab Made By People Who Want You Dead
up your nose


14 posted on 09/01/2024 3:33:47 PM PDT by SisterK (it's controlled demolition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

There’s no data in this ridiculous hit piece to support any of its claims. PCR tests are standard laboratory tests and are accurate when instructions are followed within acceptable statistical boundaries. Most contain control tests that validate the reagents used to prevent the most harmful failure, false negatives. Additional confirmatory tests quickly resolve false positives.


15 posted on 09/01/2024 3:35:19 PM PDT by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright

Of course.

Won’t satisfy people who think everyone is out to kill them though.


16 posted on 09/01/2024 3:36:55 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright

I saved a life with a +PCR for the CTX-M gene in an unexpected ESBL-E bacteremia.

Identifies blood cultures in an hour as opposed to 24-48 with standard methods.

Amazingly useful tech.


17 posted on 09/01/2024 3:41:18 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“Anyone who has ever used the PCR test as a diagnostic aid is a criminal and should be regarded as such,” Dr. Vernon Coleman writes.

Vernon Edward Coleman (born 1946) is an English conspiracy theorist and writer, who writes on topics related to human health, politics and animal welfare. He was formerly a general practitioner (GP) and newspaper columnist. Coleman’s medical claims have been widely discredited and described as pseudoscientific conspiracy theories.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernon_Coleman


18 posted on 09/01/2024 3:48:46 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

ransomnote wrote: “In the article, Dr. Coleman makes it clear he holds those knowingly using this invalid test are responsible.”

Are you aware that Coleman is not longer a doctor? He relinquished his medical licence in March 2016 and is no longer registered or licensed to practice as a GP.


19 posted on 09/01/2024 3:52:22 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

The test itself is in fact the usage. Perhaps the swab could be compared to the gun. The PCR test would be the equivalent of firing the hypothetical gun up one’s nostril.


20 posted on 09/01/2024 4:01:33 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson