This article is probably behind a paywall. You can find the link on RealClearPolitics.com that will allow you to link to, and read the entire article.
Am I correct in thinking they can only make “changes” to the Supreme Court it would require a Constitutional amendment?
Last laugh is his.
Their confidence in revealing all of their evil and destructive intent worries me
Evil has to be evil.
What a last voluntary act looks like as they hang from a lamp post by their ankles.
They will attempt to take over the Supreme Court
David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman, two Jews who probably find the Mosaic laws a pain in the arse.
Harris and Walz are pure communist tyrants trying to hide their core evil. Tim Walz speaks fluent Mandarin and spent a lot of time in China. He was seriously hanging out in Beijing during the Tiananmen Massacre. He is a absolute fan-boy of Mao. These are VERY dangerous people.
Let’s remember these proposals were triggered by liberal anger over the Dobbs decision.
Their reaction to the court issuing a decision they dislike, is to make changes to the court ,so that court in the future will issue rulings that the Liberals agree with.
Schumer is freaking out that he won’t have power any longer
He’s done
The Dems want a Constitutional crisis. The question is why? What is their endgame?
This has been Progressive policy and goal since about 1900. They do not believe there should be any restraint on governmental power. Instead, the believe any constraint on government power is evil.
Its why Fed.gov must be bankrupted and reduced to 10% of its present size.
There are potential tyrants in every time and era. We should never allow enough concentrated power in central government for them to work their schemes
This was the most important concern of America’s founders.
Just a matter of time.
And their supporters have no problem with that.
This is nothing new. The communists want all the power centered in the executive branch.
Our feminist democracy rolls on...
“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may, from time to time, ordain and establish.”
The Supreme Court itself gets to determine what “shall be vested” means. It also gets to decide what “good behavior” is.
The Article II “President, Vice President, and all civil officers” impeachment clause only applies to high crimes and misdemeanors.