Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DIRTYSECRET

As for codifying Roe there may have been political expediency involved. Obamacare was the big issue. Immigration could have been settled by running ruff-shod over the GOP minority. Too much too soon would have very well been a gamble they were not willing to take. They lost the house anyway 2 years later.


3 posted on 08/23/2024 7:10:35 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DIRTYSECRET

True ,,the way the legislative process works ,,you can only take on so many big issues at any given time.

But I’ve heard some liberals say that they never believed Roe would ever be overturned. So in that case liberals would not have wanted to get into a legislative battle over abortion.


5 posted on 08/23/2024 7:12:28 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

*Justice Ginsburg refused to take the hint and retire.*

Timing. Scalia died when the GOP had a senate majority.
I think Obama would have legalized abortion nationally on his way out if he had the chance. The issue is something that kept female voters engaged, a necessity. Same with the border. They wanted to keep the issue going.

If Trump wins the too-much-too-soon element needs be taken into account.He started with taxes last time and the balloon lost a lot of air due to rinos.


8 posted on 08/23/2024 7:19:25 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson