To: CDR Kerchner
If this issue gets the SCOTUS, they will deny taking it. It’s obvious that Cackles is not legally qualified to be the US president because she is clearly not a natural born citizen, a Constitutional requirement, since neither of her parents were US citizens when she was born.
The problem that would arise is the 8 years the Obozo was the POTUS because he didn’t meet the Constitutional requirements either. The SCOTUS will never touch the Cackles eligibility issue. Thank the democrats for killing the US Constitution.
To: drypowder
If this issue gets the SCOTUS, they will deny taking it.Do you have a preference in crystal balls or do you just use a generic one?
19 posted on
08/21/2024 9:13:11 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: drypowder
A lawsuit could start out against the DNC itself for failing to properly vet a candidate.

21 posted on
08/21/2024 9:25:32 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: drypowder
The problem that would arise is the 8 years the Obozo was the POTUS because he didn’t meet the Constitutional requirements either.
The Constitution didn't have the votes on SCOTUS in 2008 (presumably Bryer, Ginsburg, Roberts, Souter, and Stephens against). In 2024, it may well have the votes. If Harris wins and is declared ineligible, the election may be thrown to the second highest vote-getter for President and the highest vote-getter for Vice President. Then we would end up with a Trump-Walz administration.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson