Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fuzz
The 14th amendment hasn’t been challenged in the way you have been presenting it and the way the 14th amendment is written she is a US citizen.

You said natural born citizen was legally defined and Cornell says you're wrong.

She is a citizen through USC 8 Sec. 1401 naturalization, not through the 14th Amendment.

109 posted on 08/21/2024 5:48:19 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

I honestly can’t understand how the first sentence in the 14th amendment can be so confusing to you or why you can’t understand the difference between naturalization and naturally born.

Should a new amendment be passed or a Supreme Court decision come about to clarify, the constitution stands as written.

But good luck to you.


110 posted on 08/21/2024 5:54:40 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson