Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: budj

Hannibal has been criticized for not marching on Rome after his victory at Cannae, but it’s doubtful that he could have captured the city, given the length of the city walls and the size of the forces at his command. As long as the Romans had armies in the field, Hannibal could not win the war.


22 posted on 08/17/2024 2:50:48 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

At Cannae, Hannibal destroyed Rome’s last army. Taking Rome would have certainly been a long siege, up to ten years. Most of the people in Italy then were Greeks in the South and East and Celts in the North, and they didn’t like Rome at all.

It’s a great debate.


40 posted on 08/18/2024 11:27:39 AM PDT by budj (Combat vet, second of three generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson