“It’s important to note the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis is strongly opposed by many researchers, who say there is no evidence that the event was caused by a collision.”
They sure go out of their way to trash Randall Carlson and the younger dryas comet/asteroid theory. I have no idea if that theory makes sense or not but Randall is a hard core believer and makes a pretty good case.
I do wonder if Randall’s anti-climate change views has anything to do with it.
I’m sure they have an equally absurd explanation for the near worldwide distribution of Black Mat, and the Carolina Bays whose rays trace back to a location around Hudson Bay. Same for the Nebraska Rainwater Basin.
Graham Hancock also goes over this material and references in “America Before” and “The Magicians”.
Its easy to find “no evidence” when they do not look at or plain dismiss all the existing evidence.
Gradualists defending Gradualism - no feathers ruffled, everyone can be safely tucked in at night with no worries because catastrophes of such magnitude are patently impossible ... until one happens.