So therefore, no one is allowed to defend the oak from being cancelled in big cities, with the demonization of oaks everywhere to follow? Because that’s what I was saying, whereas your argument was that they inconvenience your allergies.
“So therefore, no one is allowed to defend the oak from being cancelled in big cities, “
You previously posted that your argument was not about the oaks in cities. Having been informed that the thread topic is just that you are implying you were discussing the oaks in cities.
“So therefore, no one is allowed to defend the oak from being cancelled in big cities,”
LOL!
Your VERY recent post:
My defense of oaks in general was not because of cities, “