[deks]

from Michelle Obama's twitter...

[ponygirl]

Yep, I found that one. Here's the thing... When I enlarged and inspected the photo that foldy posted, there was obvious Photoshop manipulation at the back of Michelle's head, just above her ear. I could see an airbrush tool that had cropped close to her hair using a sample from the curtain, making the back of her head almost completely straight, and then going around her ear and stopping short, leaving an odd shadow behind her head. The "fade" at the temple looked like a stamp tool using the same sample in a very small size, stamped repeatedly on the temple to make it look like a fade. Okay, so pretty certain it was manipulated to make her look more manly.

Then I went to the link for CNN and found this picture that you have posted and I went in and looked more closely at this one... lo and behold, it still looks like something was done to the back of her head, except now it looks like hair was ADDED instead of subtracted. But at least the earring now makes sense... where I thought it was blonde hair in the first photo, now I see it is a silver or shell earring.

So what do you guys think? Did someone manipulate an already manipulated photo to make Michelle look like Mike? Or was the original photo manipulated to make Mike look like Michelle? Or is that actually a little tuft of hair behind her ear and not a shadow at all? 🤔

[little jeremiah]

Michelle is female. Ungainly, of bad character, but female. I have many childhood, adolescent and young adult photos of her saved. People should give this idiocy up. As foldy said above, it is useless and distracts from actual issues.