You are just making stuff up to be insulting, or you are illiterate. Perhaps it is you that is the Democrat.
I don’t think that we could agree on much, actually. I don’t think that women playing watered-down versions of men’s sports is even a very good idea. This is only one result.
It is NOT a “chromosome thing”. Nature is nowhere near as simplistic as your understanding. You can add man’s contributions through doping to what nature produces in malformed, missing and extra chromosomes. Competition on an unlevel field is idiotic, but I would not be surprised to find scientific testing to be inadequate.
I bring up judging because it is done in animal breeds and has been for centuries. Disqualifying faults disqualify the contestant, sometimes permanently.
I suggest nudity, not to titillate you, but because the scrutiny that animals go through in judging may be too much for people. The Olympics have been performed nude in the past and visual judging may be sufficient. The Olympics has always been a quest for the human ideal. The sciences of doping and testing only make it more pointless.
I expect that you will always be where you are - not thinking very hard and in the dark.
You literally have no idea of what you are talking about.
By your 15th century standards you would toss any woman who lifted weights…by the looks of them alone.
But women to you are just livestock, I guess.