Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

NASA loves to throw money away


15 posted on 07/31/2024 5:24:04 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: butlerweave

and astranauts


17 posted on 07/31/2024 5:44:11 AM PDT by Lou Foxwell (The bleak winter of catastrophe is upon us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: butlerweave

NASA loves to throw money away


In that vein, the Griffin lunar mission was tasked with many things, but its primary reason was tpo deliverr the Vulcan lander to the Lunar south pole to look for ice and other minerals.

But because the over all price tag rose from 250 million to near 500 million, the Vulcan was canceled. But NASA still plans to use the Vulcan instruments on other lunar projects.

And not to let the Griffin mission go to waste, they plan to use it as a technology demonstrator with a dummy payload - usually a cement block.

So NASA has spent near 500 million to land a brick on the moon.

Meanwhile the Chinese have two successful; landings on the dark side - something that NASA has not attempted and probably can’t do.


28 posted on 07/31/2024 9:46:26 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson