Replies

Wray is a POS.

For there to be shrapnel capable of piercing President Trumps ear there would have to be a close bullet strike to create shrapnel.

There is a very detailed video and audio log that conclusively rules out any visual evidence of a bullet strike from the shooters direction and line of fire, nor is there any audio evidence of a bullet strike or shrapnel signature.

Furthermore, the shrapnel produced by a 5.56 round, either by fragmentation of the bullet or splatter of glass or metal frags would be too small and in the wrong direction to cause the wound in President Trumps ear. would be

Ironically, for this statement by Wary to carry any weight, there would have to be a second shooter shooting a larger caliber ammunition. In that case, it would conclusive proof of multiple shooters and a broad based conspiracy to assassinate Trump.

So - is that what Wray is trying to tell the world.

Wray is a POS.

For there to be shrapnel capable of piercing President Trumps ear there would have to be a close bullet strike to create shrapnel.

There is a very detailed video and audio log that conclusively rules out any visual evidence of a bullet strike from the shooters direction and line of fire, nor is there any audio evidence of a bullet strike or shrapnel signature.

Furthermore, the shrapnel produced by a 5.56 round, either by fragmentation of the bullet or splatter of glass or metal frags would be too small and in the wrong direction to cause the wound in President Trumps ear.

There is no video of any glass breaking because the SS was negligent and did not use the bullet proof glass barriers they usually use to block or deflect and incoming bullets. Not sure it's a really good idea for Wray to highlight this glaring and incredibly negligent omission of bullet proof glass barriers around Trump on the part of the Secret Service detail .

Ironically, for this statement by Wary to carry any weight, there would have to be a second shooter shooting a larger caliber ammunition. In that case, it would conclusive proof of multiple shooters and a broad based conspiracy to assassinate Trump.

So - is that what Wray is trying to tell the world.

Wray is a POS.

THANK GOD I AM NOT ALONE IN THINKING THIS.

I have known that for four years.

Regards.