Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: imabadboy99

Pointless speculation. Per the 12th Amendment, she could not have become the VP if she was not also eligible to be POTUS.


7 posted on 07/23/2024 3:55:58 PM PDT by Calvin Cooledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Calvin Cooledge

Her VP slot was not challenged but that doesn’t negate the issue or constitute a legal opinion on the Constitutional requirements to be POTUS or VPOTUS

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
The Constitution lists only three qualifications for the Presidency — the President must be at least 35 years of age, be a natural born citizen, and must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years.


17 posted on 07/23/2024 4:04:06 PM PDT by JayGalt (Fight! Fight! Fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Calvin Cooledge

SHE HAS NEVER BEEN ELIGIBLE FOR EITHER


24 posted on 07/23/2024 4:08:38 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Calvin Cooledge
Pointless speculation. Per the 12th Amendment, she could not have become the VP if she was not also eligible to be POTUS.

I agree that it will be treated as a moot point, but that does not mean that an ineligible candidate was not sworn in for VP.

92 posted on 07/23/2024 5:05:03 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson