Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: navymom1

The SCOTUS refused to hear these cases from 2008-2016. The originalists obviously being that the founding fathers and writers of the Constitution had all read Vattel’s laws of nations. See NY public library checkouts and 200 year later book return.

They refused because they believed that the POTUS could be sufficiently vetted by the people and the media, and they didn’t want the legal system to interfere in elections.

They have kept that trend recently, and I doubt they would stop Kamala.


6 posted on 07/23/2024 4:28:58 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pete Dovgan
and they didn’t want the legal system to interfere in elections.

Ah yes, I remember those days. :)

14 posted on 07/23/2024 5:38:39 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Pete Dovgan

—> The SCOTUS refused to hear these cases from 2008-2016. The originalists obviously being that the founding fathers and writers of the Constitution had all read Vattel’s laws of nations. See NY public library checkouts and 200 year later book return.

The new Court has demonstrated it is very willing to reconsider difficult issues.


23 posted on 07/23/2024 7:16:27 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson