My question to you is this:
Who is supposed to enforce the NBC clause, and at what stage of the process?
For example, there is no “running for President” in the Constitution. There is also no “voting for President”.
If an non-NBC were on the ballot, and won, say, California, would it be the responsibility of the Legislature to not appoint the relevant Electors? Would it be the responsibility of the Electors to vote for someone else? Etc.
Per the Founders and Framers design and intent in our U.S. Constitution, the Electoral College was to be the first check and balance, the Congress the second, and if a legal challenge is mounted to any of those constitutional bodies decision, then federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court the third. Unfortunately the Electoral College has been completely neutered by the two major political parties enacting state legislature passed laws forcing electors to not vote per their oath to the Constitution but to the outcome of the popular vote, which defeats the power of that first step check and balance. And the far-left major media pressure basically has defeated the Congressional challenges to questionable electoral college votes and ineligibility of a candidate for the high office they seek. And the federal courts and SCOTUS are ducking their responsibility to take up cases challenging the “natural born Citizen” term as it applies to a President and CinC or VP candidates.
Yes the Roberts Supreme Court has been evading the issue of “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Justice Thomas stated that before a subcommittee of Congress: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu6OiTiua08
The Roberts led court has been cowards in not supporting their oath to the U.S. Constitution and to take a case when it needs to be decided and goes to the heart of a term in the U.S. Constitution, as former Chief Justice Marshall said a long time ago: https://www.scribd.com/doc/21575466/Chief-Justice-John-Marshall-Quote-20091026-Issue-Wash-Times-National-Weekly-pg-15
So what is left at this stage in our countries history is to try and educate the American electorate to not vote for a constitutionally ineligible candidate, i.e., to not vote for a dual-Citizen, non-natural born Citizen, such as Kamala Harris. She fooled us once and she should not get away with fooling the electorate again! That is why I recommend that all candidates for federal political office, especially President and Commander in Chief, and the VP too, should have to file a National Security Q&A From SF-86 along with the current financial disclosure form. The voting public needs more transparency about the backgrounds of the candidates which an SF-86 form would provide. People going to work for the federal government fill one out. Candidates for federal office should too. See:
We the People Need More Information About the Backgrounds of Candidates for the Highest Political Offices.
Transparency Requirements for Candidates for President and Vice-President – More Is Needed in Our Modern Electoral Process – Filing The (OGE) Financial Disclosure Form 278e Is Mandatory – The (OPM) National Security Questionnaire Form SF-86 Should Also Be Mandatory: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2023/05/07/transparency-requirements-for-candidates-for-president-and-vice-president-more-is-needed-in-our-modern-electoral-process-filing-the-oge-financial-disclosure-form-278e-is-mandatory-the-opm-na/