Posted on 07/20/2024 12:55:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
I believe we heard this before...and it was a concern that may have been legitimate in 2016. We have since had a Trump administration...and he handled it well.
06/01/2016
Unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders, David French is not a household name.
But there is no doubt about where the staff writer for National Review, whose name is being floated this week by Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol as a white-knight independent presidential challenger, stands on a host of issues central to the heart of the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
An Iraq War veteran, constitutional lawyer and staunch opponent to Trump as the GOP nominee, French is on the record with a decade’s worth of conservative, at times provocative, essays ranging from a recap of the latest “Game of Thrones” saga tostates’ fight against the White House’ transgender bathroom guidance to the death of Prince to making the case for a third-party challenger to Trump. And that was just in the past two months.
“ They want disruptive change, and if violence is necessary, so be it.”
These people overlook actual violent political rhetoric and action by the left, blm, Antifa etc…
Riots, arson, murders, blockades.
Doesn’t even register with them despite happening in real life.
It’s always been leftard commie progressives vs moderate to liberal democrats within the dimwit party.
And conservatives vs. the moderate pubs, elRINOs and neocons is the pub party.
More or less.
Reading soy boy David French lecture us about what Republicans should be like is annoying.
Which cesspool is Bill Kristol floating the name of this Dreckspass in?
And of course Trump isn’t a blank slate. We’ve already seen how he governs as president.
Trump’s first term didn’t demonstrate the radicalism of Trump. It demonstrated the radicalism of the Democrat party with their spying operations and Russia Russia Russia megahoax.
I’d like to see David French prove his point about Trump’s unpredictable emotion-driven worst case policies by citing one such policy from Trump’s first term. He probably couldn’t name a single one of substance.
Isn’t it expected for a major political party in a country with the population of the US to encompass different groups each with different priorities?
David French is a POS.
Irony isn’t s that as I read the article I am listening to Frank Senator I did it my way
What crap. This is not unique to Trump. Every single constituency/voting bloc that votes for any presidential candidate wants different things from the candidate. Ultimately, some end up more satisfied, some not.
All they have is straw men about imaginary conservative boogeymen.
I believe the word for this is...
...give me a second, I'll come up with it...
..."politics."
David French.
One of the original infiltrators.
No one cares about David French anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.