Posted on 07/19/2024 4:20:11 AM PDT by MtnClimber
In 2000, as Democrats were attempting to steal the Presidential election in Florida, an article written by Jon Dougherty and David Kupelian titled “How Democrats Steal Elections” shed light on the tactics used.
What unfolded in Broward County was not new, but a replay of well-honed methodology.
The authors interviewed Bob Haueter, chief of staff to the California Assembly Republican Caucus, as well as Republicans such as former California Assemblyman Pat Nolan.
Open disclosure: Nolan was convicted in a federal corruption probe and upon release has worked with Chuck Colson -- another fallen-but-reformed public figure -- to reform the criminal justice system.
Nolan investigated elections he knew were “stolen” but unclear as to methodology.
Nolan stated, in reference to a local election: “after the election, Democrats "brought in their junkyard dog lawyers from around the country and basically harassed the local registrar -- got in their faces and demanded to handle ballots" -- which were of the same type now in dispute in Palm Beach.”
Mr. Nolan tracked down an attorney, one Tim Downs “who readily admitted the Democratic strategy” as well as methods. From the piece:
"Downs told me, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, 'You get me within 100 votes and I can steal any election.”
"The first rule is, you keep counting until you're ahead. And if that doesn't put you ahead, you recount, re-recount -- you keep counting until you're ahead.”
Second, "the more times those ballots are handled, the more chance there is that chads will break loose" and be disqualified.
Third, "the minute you're ahead, you stop and declare yourself the victor."
The term ‘close’ once meant a hundred as being the ‘cheatable spread.’ That was then and this is now:
The story, originally incorrectly debunked by various ‘fact checkers.’ now makes 200,000 to 300,000 votes to be...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
With mail in voting and voter rolls packed with fake voter registrations, and where there is lax or no signature verification, there is likely huge numbers of fraudulent votes that are not being detected. All pre planned.
Late 1960s, Chicago South Side, there was a 3-story apartment building that was condemned. The entire building of 18 units was closed off with no one living inside. First year, dozens of dead people voted from that address. Second year, over one hundred voters registered and voting from a condemned building. The numbers only went up from there.
This was almost 60 years ago. Imagine what they can do electronically today. And just to be fair, it happens on both sides. How do you think John McCain was reelected in Arizona so many times when regular Republican voters claimed they did not vote for him? It is the only way voter fraud is perpetrated, both sides can be threatened with being exposed. We need the death penalty for voter fraud.
BTTT
Jay Valentine works for an organization that developed software that can compare voter roll data to multiple other data types, such as property tax records, to identify suspicious voter registration patterns to help scrub them off the voter rolls. He has had problems getting the attention of the RNC.
"Coffee and a Mike" with Jay Valentine | ELECTIONS ARE NO LONGER ON THE LEVEL
This is my prediction: Once the Democrats select a new candidate, the buzz will increase through the media and the polls will miraculously tighten. This is how they will legitimize the fraud that will occur. Joe got 81 million votes in 2020, this person will get 84 million. I can see it coming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.