[lepton]

So, this turns out to be just a “pound the table” legal argument.

---

I’m not sure it is even that. It might just be to enable a *political* argument by making the (false) comparison to Trump’s cases.

[Paladin2]

Fair observation.

The US legal system has now four classes of argumentation?

Argue the Politics

Argue the Facts

Argue the Law

Pound the Table

[And (as a sixth) I would propose: Argue the emotions]

[Paladin2]

MORE than a “fair” Observation....

The “Law” these days is WAY less than deterministic.

Traitor Roberts is totally wrong on his pronouncement that there are NO political Judges.

[“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.”]

Traitor Roberts is apparently an idiot. He’s definitely a part of the problem.