[Reno89519]

It doesn't have to. She is Vice-President Harris, maybe President Harris in coming days, she is she or her, and I don't see why anyone needs to identify her sex, race, or whatever further unless it is specifically in context. We don't refer to President Trump by his race or sex, so don't with Vice-President Harris.

We should be respectful. Sure, they'll still call us sexist and racist, but why feed them quotes?

And lastly, I think referring to her as "Ho" is inflammatory and should be stopped.

[cgbg]

“I think referring to her as “Ho” is inflammatory and should be stopped.”

Lol—you are a racist sexist colonialist hegemonic hater extremist according to the left—and being nice to Kamala is not gonna save you.

Remember—silence is violence!

[SamuraiScot]

I don't see why anyone needs to identify her sex. . .

Because they have eyes, ears, experience, and instinct, and they know the difference between male and female.

In the case of a monarch from a royal family, one could say either a king or queen could make sense as the leader of the whole shebang--because a monarch has the use of other members of his family, both male and female, and history--all reinforcing his power, influence, and effectiveness.

That's not true in our system, where we elect a man (or woman) to office to act as both an individual and a leader. The leader has no family, tradition, or history to back him up and give him gravitas in the eyes of his constituents and produce national unity.

A man has more natural aggression, a bigger voice, and a higher likelihood of being able to lead a group of strangers to united, and when necessary, violent action.