Posted on 07/17/2024 10:14:31 PM PDT by John Robinson
We know the FBI develops "domestic terrorists" with the intent of capturing them in the act, to give themselves a great big pat on the back, push the "rightwing extremism" narrative ("but the shooter was Republican!"), and to justify budget increases.
Let's say the FBI was grooming this kid. They didn't intend for an assassination. But, of course, government is incompetent so it got away from them. (See Fast and Furious, et al.)
Now, let's assume this scheme was passed along outside and upwards of the agency, to somebody with great power, enough to influence choices within multiple agencies, or even only the USSS. If somebody knew the FBI was hatching a scheme, and because we only needed to rely on malicious compliance to get the desired kill shot, it would be pretty easy for just one or few individuals to ensure the Grade F (JB) team who hated Trump would be assigned this particular task.
That's one or very few people required to possibly effect an assassination.
To explain things like shorting DJT, that could simply be an act of insider knowledge to influence a trade, could be sourced from within the Crooks grooming FBI, or somebody who noticed a brewing flustercluck of an assignment in Trump's security detail, who also is aware of the tinderbox of a political environment currently. Actually, it seems a tipoff to an intentional weakened security detail could have alerted many others (photogs, camera crew, etc.) to take a special interest in this Butler event.
I don't buy anything these agencies say, they gaslight us profusely. But I can't do these all-encompassing conspiracy theories involving dozens if not hundreds of people. That's not how the world works. Just a few rogue people with the right knowledge and evil intention is all that is necessary. Maybe it's just two lovers texting about insurance policies?
Does this idea hold water?
What if the kid was never intended by those who set him up to ever be able to take a shot? That’s what I’m getting at here. That some G-man interfered with some other G-man’s play to effect a real attempt. They wouldn’t even care if it actually happens or not. (It wasn’t “mission critical”, just a “nice outcome.”)
Thank you John.
Me and mine are doing well today, thank the Good Lord.
How is Jim doing?
My opinion: the kid was put there intentionally to get his brains blown out by the sniper teams. He was sacrificed so the SS could say “we got the shooter, case closed.”
Thank the Lord!
He’s looking good.
Charles Ortel is CLOSING IN – Joe is Lost with Special Guest John Cullen
Bloggers & Personal forum, on a thread titled Did Trump’s Shooter Have Help?, Vendome wrote:
There was one guy at the presser the day after they tried to kill Trump saying the perp was outside the perimeter????
Outside the perimeter? That perimeter is is anything within eyesight of The President and a bit beyond.
How in the Ho Lee Phuk is that possible?
I’ve been to Trump rallies and snipers are everywhere, including in the hills surrounding.
Security is actually visible for miles before you even get to a rally venue.
I felt safe, as well, unconcerned for The President’s safety
Moreover, there was a helicopter circling the event
The building 20 feet behind the dead dude is actually one story higher and begs the question “Why wasn’t a team on top of those buildings?” We know the answer.
Moreover, there is a 90 foot water directly to the east and overlooking all the buildings where dead was and he would have been easily seen if a team was on that water tower.
It is only 100yrds to the east. https://www.google.com/maps/place/615+Whitestown+Rd,+Meridian,+PA+16001/@40.8585856,-79.9698802,577m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x88337d9ebe29308f:0x1b4bca6251cd761e!8m2!3d40.8585186!4d-79.9699773!16s%2Fg%2F11ckqj_ky9?entry=ttu
No one on building to secure it.
No one overlooking to secure it.
So… a guy just decides to show up at a rally and take a potshot at PDJT… and he looks around for a spot that wasn’t covered by USSS and… well whadaya know! He’s in luck. A handy barn roof with no-one on it. And his rifle happens to be sighted in for the distance to the stage.
Now, let’s just see if he can get up there with a rifle without being spotted. Well whaddaya know! Another lucky break! Wait… he was spotted and pointed out to security, Well whaddaya know! Three times lucky! Security blew it off.
Oops. His luck ran out. He was shot deader’n a doornail. Tsk, tsk. Too bad. Can’t question him now.
Gonna be lots of stuff out there
Fact is “it should have never happened “
That it did is inexplicable and no answer will be acceptable
Snipers have an Area of Operation
In that AO are Squares that they are responsible for scanning hostiles and intelligence
Each Square also has math notes for distance, elevation, declination, etc
This was not a slipup
Why is no one talking about the water tower?
Social Engineering the Public's Perception - a Poem and a video link
Two perps, but only one gets to be the poor loner high school student . . . who went bad and is registered Republican - who are the ones who are so violent ....
By JENNIFER DEPEW, R.D.
That is nice. We miss him around here.
It’s more plausible they’ve been leaving gaps in his security perimeter for a long time hoping someone would take advantage of it. Trump needs his own security consultant to check every venue and its security going forward...and hire a dozen or so bodyguards...I also expect every MAGA supporter to be on full alert at any event going forward.
The only thing I know for sure is that we will never know for sure:
Because no matter what we learn, and no matter what we can assume from logic and analysis, those who made it happen or merely allowed it to happen will never admit it.
On Sunday, I was pretty certain that there was at least one more shooter, but with things I learned on Monday, I could see it being just whoever it was on the roof, although I still believe that he couldn’t have done it without inside intel, and maybe logistical help from several law enforcement officials.
But a lot of people who were there, on the ground and close to the action are still convinced there were multiple shooters. Whether any of them have the knowledge and / or experience to actually understand what they saw and heard, I couldn’t say. Such events can be very confusing even to people who are combat veterans.
When the individual went from suspicious to a threat you find out who in the detail ok’d letting Trump go on stage, that would be your guy to question if this kid had help.
You never let your guy go on stage under an active threat. If this was gross incompetence, well, the odds of that many blunders seem slim to impossible in my eyes.
Yeah, that would have to be the case for this kid to not have been “delivered” to this exact event. The one problem with your theory is that Butler seemed to be an exception by many accounts. But maybe that’s just people’s reaction given that something happened here, that’s plausible, too. Maybe all along these events have just been inadequately secured.
We should be looking back at past rallies. Were they secured properly? Would be a good question to answer.
I suppose clues can be gleaned from knowing more about kid’s training to operate weapon used. Where, how long, who paid?
I don’t recall reading anything yet about family background of dead shooter.
Wasn’t the El Paso Walmart killer a very similar sort of person?
“...12 million shares of DJT stock were shorted...”
I love a good conspiracy theory, but I wonder how that compares with other days over the last few months/years.
There were about three interviews I saw claiming there was a shooter in the water tower, for example. But given the way the mind works, they could have easily heard the shots, turned to see a water tower, and made the assumed connection that must have been from where they came. The mind could go as far as fabricating that evidence in mind’s eye with certainty if it was the belief of the person. Which is why witness testimony is often unreliable.
The incontrovertible fact is that MUST SECURE areas were never secured.
Great question. https://fintel.io/sosh/us/djt
Why would the Democrats be any different than the Mafia? I think the Demos are capable of doing anything the Mafia might do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.