Posted on 07/17/2024 2:23:08 PM PDT by rxsid
ππππ ππ: Video emerges suggesting there may have been a second shooter...
Are we witnessing another FBI coverup?
Credits: https://t.co/xax8TiBTrr pic.twitter.com/sVviEavqeqβ legislation (@legislationpage) July 17, 2024
multiple eyewitnesses ...
ππππ ππ: Multiple witnesses now coming forward backing up reports of a second shooter.
Developing... https://t.co/amupwuiABS pic.twitter.com/ubOwmGCMKDβ legislation (@legislationpage) July 17, 2024
“The NTD video shows the hit “
Link?
“Reported by who?”
whom:
Media
Local PE
Secret Service
Attendees
Local LE said their guy missed.
*******************
There were two sniper teams in black on the roofs behind Trump. Now whether they were SS or local, I don’t know.
Or did the SS sniper look up to reacquire the shooter. That often helps to get back on the target due to the limited field of scopes. By the way, you will notice that the SS snipers were on a sloping roof. Thank God they didn’t roll off and cause another tragedy.
And what if the shooter thought he would get the Sirhan Sirhan treatment?
Attendees are also saying there was someone on the water tower who was involved. They are discounted out of hand...just because?
“There were two sniper teams in black on the roofs behind Trump. Now whether they were SS or local, I donβt know.”
The team closest to the shooter wore “POLICE secret service”
BS, if that were true Trump would be dead.
Meanwhile, check this video. Which grandstand are these people in?
(The one farthest from the shooter, that’s which. Calculate that trajectory...)
https://nitter.poast.org/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1813362557945573400#m
And you out your faith with somebody that draws two lines and plays a background song track ...
But why duck?
He's got Crooks in his sights. He's observing him.
He looks up after he hears the first shot. Ok, perhaps. But didn't he already have him sighted in? Why look up and loose sighting/timing? Is that what snipers are trained to do?
He then ducks. Why? Because he heard that shot? Or, because he heard something much closer, whizzing by his head?
He then re-engages, re-acquires (after having already acquired the shooter) and takes a shot. Ok, sure.
Doesn't his action in the middle seems out of place for a sniper? And, even before that where he looks up and away from his scope? Strange.
“Was it someone inside the building shooting at Trump, knowing within seconds the patsy would be eliminated?”
My thought also.
The FBI will never allow any evidence of a second shooter to surface. It may well be out there, but won’t survive long if made public prior to publication.
And where’s this faith I have in this guy’s theory?
And what did the other sniper team on the roof further back wear?
Good question. I have yet to see any video or pictures of them. Granted, I’ve not been looking into this but for an hour or two a day since.
Video of the people in the Grandstand farthest from the shooter with people seeming to be hit in a line parallel to the top back rail of that grandstand:
https://nitter.poast.org/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1813204542143479880#m
“And whereβs this faith I have in this guyβs theory?”
Your (sic) joking, right?
Where is it? Because I posted something from X for discussion, I have “faith” in the theory? Are you joking?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.