Climate change “scientist” use computer generated models. They plug their opinions and emotions into these models, not fact, hit the button see what the result is and see how much money will be provided to fix the problem based on the climate cultist reactions. If the reaction isn’t producing the money needed and the climate cultist aren’t freaked out enough, they change their opinions, recalculate and hope for a better reaction.
It’s all very scientific!!
Man made CO2 accounts for 5% of the atmospheric CO2.
Why does this 5% cause climate change but the other 95% does not?
EC
they use computer simulations as their test
As the real truth about the fabrication and distortion of the data related to Global Warming/Climate Change has become more widely known vis-a-vis CO2, the purveyors of the scam have begun to switch gears. Methane is the new bugaboo. You can expect increases in new “studies & research” with regard to this new “existential threat to life on this planet”. Cow farts notwithstanding, most methane is released in fluctuating amounts due to decomposition of organic material and volcanic activity, which humans have virtually no influence upon.
Your opening premise is flawed. There is no single, universally-accepted "scientific method."
They experimented using their models, which were constructed to give the answer they wanted.