Posted on 07/14/2024 7:51:21 PM PDT by ransomnote
The weirdness of this shooter makes me wonder if there might be family ties to the MK-Ultra psychiatrists.
I do not doubt he was part of the plot. I just don’t think he knew what part.
Stating the obvious, a power capable of compromising the Secret Service and getting this guy (and his weapon) into position, would 100% of the time come equipped with a patsy.
A dead patsy is their first layer of defense against discovery.
I think this one is going to unravel on them, possibly exposing the forces controlling the deep state as never before.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
After writing the above, I made a little bet with myself that Crooks’ family would have ties to state or cabal psychiatric services (like Hinkley for example, or Squeaky Fromme). I found this: “His parents are both certified behavioral health counselors, his father for the psychiatric bureaucracy of the Western Pennsylvania health care monopoly UPMC.”
Want cabal? Crooks had direct links with both Blackrock and Carlysle.
Crap!
Thx!
I agree with you. I don’t think the white hats would go that far.
And poor President Trump to lose a friend at such a time.
Edited.
I think they will nominate Hakeem Jeffries at the convention to try to win back the black vote.
Right.
The first question for every KKKRat and media liar in this election should be: “What did they know? (about Biden) and when did they know it?
Second question: Which are you: liar or idiot?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4252485/posts?page=1
BREAKING: Mark Halperin: Biden to Drop Out of Race as Early as Sunday, Won’t Endorse Kamala Harris – Open Convention.. and More!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 7/18/2024 | Cristina Laila
ThankQ aMPU and foldspace!
Perfect idea. He’s competent when speaking.
I do not necessarily agree with the ‘staged’ theory, but appreciate the discussion and points made in the linked vids. They were not anti-Trump.
Clearly the rush of information was to support the ‘lone gunman’ concept. Stepping back for a broader view can be helpful.
If they took that out as a Put option they were at far less of loss risk, the entity selling the Put would be on the hook for producing the shares to honor the Put at execution. Austin Private Wealth (APW hereafter) is only out the purchase price of the Puts, and given the general low probability of the Stock falling into the execution range they were probably pretty freakin’ cheap.
Where this gets squirrely is the effect on the party putting up the other side of the put. If the horrible case happened and the companies tanked, they would have been forced to go to market to provide the shares for delivery OR produced the shares if they held them. As the fallout of the attempt stands, I’d be all over protesting delivery from standpoint of obvious insider knowledge.
If APW had actually short sold the shares they probably would have been destroyed. In the “Short” you borrow the shares and sell them right then, hoping to be able to buy them back at the subsequently lower price. Very dangerous because the potential gain is finite (stock goes to 0) but the loss potantial is infinite.
The put options were probably in the neighborhood of 1-5% of share price, variability being the expiration time and a slight uptick in a certain number of traders that will always throw a few dollars at something like this just stacking chips on the low probability side of black swan events. AWP is probably out no more than $25M on this, but you can bet your butt that the negative publicity and the scrutiny of the trade down the road is going to cost a couple times that at least, and if there is the stink of direct collusion in there, a noose???
Great to work together as FReeQs!
——if you like your health care-—you can keep your health care. I forget which lying sob said that?
Big Myke’s beard...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.