the big question with all of these “capture” processes is what are the energy requirements? ... are more CO2 equivalent tons released than “captured”? .... it’s no good to say, well, no CO2 was released by the process because we’re using solar or geothermal energy, because that’s energy that COULD have been used to substitute for petro-generated energy ...
so one has to look at the number of BTU/hours consumed per ton of “captured” and “stored” CO2, and calculate the number of tons of CO2 that would be released by that many BTU/hours generated by burning petro fuels ... would that number of tons of CO2 be more or less than the amount “captured” and “stored”?
Carbon dioxide does not affect the temperature in the first place. It is a marxist hoax to gain control of the means of production. The carbon capture is just a thing to make the hoax look legitimate.