Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Have a ‘Plan C’ for Their Biden Problem (Place Barack Obama on the ticket as VP)
PJ Media ^ | 7/7/2024 | Matt Margolis

Posted on 07/07/2024 1:36:25 PM PDT by Signalman

Joe Biden appears to be in a free fall in the polls, yet he appears unwilling to drop out of the presidential race. His campaign, the White House, and the Democratic Party are all in chaos. If Biden won't leave, what is the party to do? If "Plan B" is replacing Biden and he won't go, a left-wing scholar is advocating a "Plan C" to save the president's floundering campaign.

Supporters of this plan suggest a straightforward strategy to counter Trump’s growing campaign momentum: replace Vice President Kamala Harris with former President Barack Obama.

“A Biden-Obama ticket would have a much better chance of beating Trump,” explained John Banzhaf, a professor at George Washington University Law School.

“Barack Obama is likely one of the few individuals whom a majority of Americans would want and trust as president," he claimed, without evidence. "Making Plan C possibly the least objectionable of several unappealing options now available to Biden and the Democratic Party."

Banzhaf argues that none of the alternatives to Biden appear to be in any better position to win the presidency, and even if they were, the money raised by the Biden-Harris campaign can't simply be transferred to another campaign.

You're probably thinking, "But what about the 22nd Amendment?"

Banzhaf argues that the 22nd Amendment, often cited as a barrier to Barack Obama serving as president again, doesn't actually prevent him from becoming vice president and then succeeding to the presidency.

The 22nd Amendment:

"No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice, and no person who has held the office of the president, or acted as president, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected president shall be elected to the office of the president more than once."

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: obamavp; pjmedia; planc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Signalman

They have no one new just old TRASH


41 posted on 07/07/2024 2:24:54 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

They would argue that while Obama would constitutionally ineligible to be elected president, nothing in either amendment makes him ineligible to serve as president. Based simply on the text of the amendments, they would have an argument, and it would be up to SCOTUS to settle. They might decide it is a political question and if the people vote for it to allow it. It is not as cut and dried as you might think.


42 posted on 07/07/2024 2:27:43 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Michelle Obama would be eligible...but they would have to get a majority in both the House and the Senate to approve the nomination. Probably not a problem in the Senate but the Republicans have a majority in the House.


43 posted on 07/07/2024 2:29:26 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

As ignorant as 99% of civics as Americans are, I doubt even the dumbest ones will allow this.


44 posted on 07/07/2024 2:29:49 PM PDT by llevrok (“In a time of deceit telling, the truth is a revolutionary act.” ― George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman; God luvs America

The left will say that the qualifications under the 12th amendment are simply “be a natural-born citizen, at least thirty-five years of age, and a resident of the United States for at least fourteen years”.

I think it’s most likely that SCOTUS would see pushing Obama into the VP slot as a blatant attempt to circumvent the 22nd Amendment. Even a strict textualist like the late Justice Scalia would have seen through it. Still, I would expect a 6-3 or possibly 5-4 ruling.


45 posted on 07/07/2024 2:30:08 PM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

The Constitution mandates no more than two terms or ten years.

Of course, that may be racism if anyone wants to take that mandate literally.


46 posted on 07/07/2024 2:30:42 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“...since the laws and constitution are silent on the specific issue of a twice elected president running for VP...”

No, it is not silent when it specifies two terms or no more than ten years. Being a vice-president can not shoe horn more than the ten years into the intrepretation of the law.


47 posted on 07/07/2024 2:32:54 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

It doesn’t violate the letter of the 22nd, so it would be up to the American people to decide - and Trump would win in a landslide. The American people would see right through the Putin-level backdoor around the 22nd Amendment, the election wouldn’t even be close.


48 posted on 07/07/2024 2:33:21 PM PDT by CaliGangsta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

true


49 posted on 07/07/2024 2:34:39 PM PDT by God luvs America (6young 3.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

“I don’t think SCOTUS would allow that.”

Potential Biden response: “How many F-16’s does the Supreme Court have?”


50 posted on 07/07/2024 2:34:52 PM PDT by howlinhound (Tagline in the shop for repairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Did he get it from snoggling with Jill?


51 posted on 07/07/2024 2:36:12 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Literally nothing more than a jagoff blog post, by some attention whore named John Be-toff who barely knew how to post it to Twotter and PRLog, which is where dumb shit goes to die.


52 posted on 07/07/2024 2:37:03 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (TrumpII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

This guy is a law professor? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

He should be fired as a complete incompetent, since no person can be elected to be a vice president under the 12th amendment, if they cannot also be elected to be president.


53 posted on 07/07/2024 2:42:32 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." - The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Unfortunately you are wrong. Half the country would cheer it and see it as their side “winning!”


54 posted on 07/07/2024 2:47:56 PM PDT by 1malumprohibitum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

These are the people who are warning us about the dangers to democracy. They just want to ignore the Constitution.


55 posted on 07/07/2024 2:51:19 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Remember, these days being an esteemed professor makes one more, rather than less, likely to be a drooling idiot


56 posted on 07/07/2024 2:52:05 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Not allowed under constitution


57 posted on 07/07/2024 2:56:56 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Hes not eligible because he can’t be president again.


58 posted on 07/07/2024 3:02:13 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

Yep


59 posted on 07/07/2024 3:03:03 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

People need to quit coming up with these absurd scenarios of what they think it’s going to happen or whatever they think it’s possible. Most of it is not logical and it’s not going to happen under any circumstances and Obama is not gonna be on the ticket as vice president. Why would he take such a position after being president?


60 posted on 07/07/2024 3:06:31 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson