[dware]

It did use several gambling links, although none official, but this wasn’t based on that. This was based solely on current headlines. Only reason it scanned odds sites is because I asked for odds.

[RoosterRedux]

I think your question is waaaay too advanced for AI at this point. I find that it can do the work of a young paraprofessional (even with an advanced degree), but to expect that it can do the work of an experienced professional...well, that won't work (yet).

If you ask it to design a rocket, airplane, car, house, or ship, it will provide a vague answer.

But if you tell it that you are designing a rocket, etc., for a specific task and need for it to have certain capabilities and design characteristics and want to know if ChatGPT can help you design it, I think the answer will be yes.

[Freest Republican]

My point is that you asked it for odds that are all but meaningless. even if they were the current odds at those places.

Also, some of the math is inaccurate.

ie

“Biden’s odds are listed around +156 to +300, translating to a 36% to 45% chance”

+300 is 3/1 or 1 in 4 or 25%. +156 is 36%.

“odds ranging from -133 to -175, suggesting a 55% to 57% chance of winning the election.”

-133 is 57% and -175 is over 63%.