Posted on 07/01/2024 10:08:20 AM PDT by dware
GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out.
NY Times has it 10 points higher for Trump.
The current stage of artificial intelligence is that it is rock stupid.
It may get better—or maybe it will not.
Wait until the down ballot Dems realize that they are in jeopardy due to Biden's dementia being revealed.
What was the question/prompt to ChatGPT, precisely as submitted?
The AI was trained on a lot of old, bogus, and biased material. No different than asking 25 MSNBC hosts what they think.
Maybe in time as more pro-Trump info like today’s ruling is factored in, the AI outcome will be different.
IOW, some people will vote for someone who’s only ability is to fog a mirror, if it means a vote against Trump. Man, the TDS is strong.
The funniest takeaway I got from the Debate was that 33% said they thought Biden won. The lying is strong with that group. Either that or they are imbeciles, which I highly doubt. Then again, we may be seeing the Great Delusion discussed in the Bible about the last days. Seriously.
Which is why AI will likely never become "self aware" and take over the world Skynet style. There will always be need for human input/interaction.
To dismiss it entirely, however, is a mistake. It IS a decent tool, and getting stronger. Now, as far as whether or not it's garbage, I've made it my hobby's work to study AI and how it works. AI WILL take over our every day lives within the next generation. We already interact in many cases with it without even knowing. Gen Z was the last generation born into a world that isn't heavily AI controlled.
I can't agree. Back in 2004-2006, I taught computer classes at a local tech college. One of the first things I would have my students do is have a chat with the then, "A-i.com chat bot", a very rudimentary program that would answer some basic questions, but sometimes without a lot of coherence. The difference between that AI and today's AI is a massive leap forward, and far more coherent/"smart".
ChatGPT is about the worst tool you can use for current analysis. It’s no better than a basic search engine at that point, since it doesn’t have that data in its LLM.
Bump
This particular scan was based on headlines of today, with the odds being worked out via current sentiment in the sources used, nothing more, nothing less. Almost like a Google search on steroids.
It all depends how you are measuring AI.
It certainly flunks the Turing test in political matters.
The average college freshmen could do more thorough analysis.
TDS. They'll vote for Cookie Monster if he was running against Trump.
I’ve been using/studying how to use ChatGPT for a bit over a year now. I realize it has its quirks. I understand many of those, and how to use it. No, it isn’t an all knowing all powerful system, and I never would want it to be. It’s far better than Google, in my opinion, and has been extremely fun to learn and operate.
As could I, if I pressed the AI. All in methodology.
Only three places allow professional gamblers to bet on the election. The immense vast majority ban winners and/or have $100 limits iow are worthless.
I doubt any of their odds are listed on those links.
1)Pres Trump is $1.73 to win $1.00 with $50,000 limits
2)Pres Trump is $1.71 to win $1.00 with $2000 limits
3)Pres Trump is $1.56 to win $1.00 it is an exchange the limits are whatever is currently offered.
I share my work with friends who are in the same business (managing stock portfolios) and their opinions regarding ChatGPT are the same as mine.
Based on the work done so far, ChatGPT is like a brilliant but naive assistant (with a post-graduate degree in the quantitative side of business/economics).
Naturally, the questions/prompts to ChatGPT have to be very precise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.