[Lazamataz]

While I have no use for ACB, I want to offer an alternative. Roberts needed someone to write the best dissent that could be written to show exactly how utterly styoopid the judges and prosecutors in the DC circuit were.

Interesting thesis. Plausible, knowing the cloak-and-dagger nature of DC.

[AndyJackson]

One could argue in support of this position the article itselgf wherein it is stated The dissent, by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, instead read the statute out of its context to cover “all sorts of actions that affect or interfere with official proceedings.

Any halfwit 2nd year law student knows that you don't read a stautory provision out of the context of the rest of the statute unless you are a judge, appellate panel or prosecutor in the DC Circuit out to get Trump and his supporters.

I don't have any evidence against my thesis that ACB is squish, but she is not a half-wit.