Now that ChatGPT can scan sites, I think it’s going to be a boon to data collection on many, many fronts. But, it still has it’s issues, as has been pointed out earlier here. I’m having fun with it. Especially where I can download this type of data from wherever I want, have the AI place results into a spreadsheet and let me download it. Just wild.
Based on additional posts reviewed from Free Republic, here is the updated analysis of potential vice-presidential candidates for Trump in 2024:
1. Vivek Ramaswamy: 17%
Strong support for his intelligence and potential roles in both VP and other high-level positions.
2. J.D. Vance: 16%
Positive reception for his alignment with Trump’s policies and political capabilities.
3. Kristi Noem: 12%
Significant support but with some reservations regarding her handling of past controversies.
4. Tim Scott: 10%
Mixed reactions with some viewing him as not the right fit due to his perceived "goofiness."
5. Marco Rubio: 9%
Negative sentiment, seen as too establishment and not likely to drive significant change.
6. Elise Stefanik: 9%
Mixed reactions, with some support for her toughness and capability to attract votes in New York, but concerns about her performance on the national stage.
7. Tulsi Gabbard: 8%
Mixed reactions due to her past Democratic affiliation but appreciated for her strong character.
8. Josh Hawley: 6%
Positive mentions for his strong conservative principles and boldness.
9. Ben Carson: 5%
Mentioned as a solid candidate with strengths in appealing to voters in Detroit and for his past performance in the Trump administration.
10. Doug Burgum: 4%
Mixed reactions. Some see him as an effective leader from North Dakota, but others are skeptical about his national appeal and impact (Free Republic) (Free Republic) (Free Republic) (Free Republic) (Free Republic).
11. Kari Lake: 4%
Recognized for her media presence and support for Trump’s policies.
12. Ron DeSantis: 3%
Seen as more effective in his current role as Governor of Florida rather than as VP.
13. Mark Robinson: 3%
Noted for his strong, uncompromising stance.
14. Glenn Youngkin: 2%
Less frequently mentioned compared to other candidates.
The interesting potential is for stuff like this, which would is virtually impossible to do otherwise. Imagine a search engine-like capability to find what you want to know about when you can’t define it with a simple algorithm. For example, it would be easy to search the FR database to identify how often “Vivek” was mentioned, but that would be meaningless without putting it in the VP context.