“group of 13 teenagers — honest, I’m not making this up — sued Hawaii’s government over its use of fossil fuels.”
And they had “standing.” Interesting. I guess we all have to vote harder.
Out of curiosity, could one sue these teenagers for using fossil fuels, or anything derived thereof?
Perhaps it’s time to go Alinsky on their behinds. Make them live up to their own standards.
>And they had “standing.”<
To use the SCOTUS logic used in Murthy vs Missouri
that removed the injunction stopping government’s social media censorship, past harm is not an indicator of future harm. SMH
So, no. They would not have standing.
EC