Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tell It Right

Since Neanderthals weren’t animals, it’s not surprising that it wasn’t mentioned.


17 posted on 06/17/2024 8:14:00 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

“Since Neanderthals weren’t animals, it’s not surprising that it wasn’t mentioned.”

Neanderthals predated recorded history by a lot, which, historically speaking, is a relatively modern innovation.


24 posted on 06/17/2024 8:25:28 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv; MeanWestTexan
Since Neanderthals weren’t animals, it’s not surprising that it wasn’t mentioned.
Biologically speaking, Neanderthals were humans.

I thought that, "biologically speaking" even homo sapiens (modern human beings) are animals. So it stands to reason to refer to neanderthals as animals too, however close one may think they were to homo sapiens. Yet they were different enough from homo sapiens IMHO for interbreeding with them to be remarkable, as in remarkably weird.

30 posted on 06/17/2024 8:36:44 AM PDT by Tell It Right (Galatians 6:14 -- May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson