I don't really 'get' the strategy the Dems/DS used in putting Joe up for election in 2020. They knew he was always dumb and by then, declining. Obama said Biden could be relied upon to make a mess of things.
I'm wondering if they 'needed' a Joe in order to create a desperation scenario in which the Dems would accept a candidate they'd otherwise reject.
This debate fiasco seems planned, to 'help' the Obama regime replace Joe. No one believed he could debate Trump.
So maybe it's Michele, but if so she was generally so unlikable, this was their only strategy to shoe-horn her in?
I like the first forum thread below because it documents that Joe was cognitively slow in 2017. I think the Dems need to realize their traitorous 'leaders' knowingly put an incompetent puppet in office, creating this fake 'emergency'. I recall leftists screaming Trump made us look bad on the world stage, and since then we have footage of Biden wandering aimlessly or having to be led back to group photographs in Europe.
The New York Post Nailed Biden's Cognitive Problem: And Was Ignored
Newsbusters ^ | June 29, 2024 | Jeffrey LordPosted on 6/29/2024, 4:35:40 PM by grundle
Back there in the Stone Age of February, 2024, the New York Post headlined:
Jill Biden and Dems committed elder abuse on Joe — now they must force him to step aside
Among other things the Post Editorial Board wrote:
As part of special counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into Joe Biden, he reviewed interviews conducted by a ghostwriter with Biden after he left office.
The former vice president was “painfully slow,” Hur’s report notes, with ” limited precision and recall.”
This is in 2017 — three full years before he ran for president. What Hur has proven is that Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is not new, and it certainly wasn’t a secret.
Jill Biden knew. His aides knew. Heck, James Clyburn, the entire Democratic establishment knew.
Indeed they all did know. And so too did the mainstream media. And they said - and did - nothing.
MORE AT LINK