FROM AN EMAIL:
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-is-real-because-math-says-so
Q is Real, Because Math Says So. Time to Put an End to All Doubt
BY AMERICAN HYPNOTIST
Greetings Friends,
I’m going to make a bold claim: the only way a person could doubt that Q is a legitimate insider is if they don’t understand Q.
Put another way, when someone claims that Q is just a “LARP” (an actor, in other words), then this alone shows you that they have no idea what they’re talking about.
I don’t intend to be rude per se—however, considering the derisive treatment of Q supporters by the “anti Q” world (comprising of many on both sides of the political aisle), I don’t plan on sparing anyone’s feelings, either. When people lambaste Q supporters for being “stupid” or “lazy” or “crazy”, they’re behaving in the precisely same manner as the left does when they baselessly accuse Trump supporters of being dumb, evil, etc.
Condemnation or dismissal without sufficient cause should NOT be the standard way that people deal with each other—nor should it be the standard method by which logical proposals are evaluated. If one is going to paint one’s countrymen with broad brushstrokes as dumb or crazy, then such an accusation should be founded upon a legitimate review of objective evidence. Society cannot function—let alone improve—when feelings supersede rationality.
My challenge to all who would say that Q is nothing more than a LARP is this: can you provide a workable mathematic/statistical model that compels us to assume Q is “fake”, rather than a legitimate insider connected to Trump?
If one intends to dismiss or debunk Q, then it’s nothing short of mandatory to answer this question. Not a SINGLE detractor has ever produced such a model in the past six and a half years since Q first appeared on the scene.
...MORE