Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stars & stripes forever

Now this:

“... now rejected that agreement at the behest of the Biden Administration, thereby allowing the federal government to interfere with agreements between the States within their own jurisdictions.

According to Paxton’s office, in the dissent, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained: “The Court’s decision is inconsistent with how original jurisdiction cases normally proceed. It defies 100 years of this Court’s water law jurisprudence. And it represents a serious assault on the power of States to govern, as they always have, the water rights of users in their jurisdictions.”

Copyright 2024 KBTX. All rights reserved.

https://www.kbtx.com/2024/06/22/tx-attorney-general-responds-us-supreme-court-decision-blocking-texas-rio-grande-water-deal-with-new-mexico/


1,453 posted on 06/23/2024 8:45:43 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey. For Greater Glory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1447 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

Noone’s property rights are worth anything after this ruling.


1,455 posted on 06/23/2024 8:47:06 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1453 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson