Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC Trump case....what happened to the "leaked juror" story"...?
Self | 6/10/2024 | Self

Posted on 06/10/2024 8:39:57 AM PDT by Victor

After all the clamor and even news reporting of the cousin on the jury who reported to her cousin that the verdict would be "guilty"...BEFORE the verdict was handed down...

Any developments? Crazy quiet...Even Hannity reported this on Friday night.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Victor

Not much faith in Trump’s legal team.


21 posted on 06/10/2024 9:04:43 AM PDT by kenmcg (ti hi o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victor

One look at the person who made the most and it was obvious it was a hoax not sure why the ny Supreme Court got so easily fooled took people five minutes to see something wasn’t right


22 posted on 06/10/2024 9:05:57 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victor

Anyone could have made that post. It could be a hoax, merely an idiotic prank, by someone sympathetic to either side of the case. The jurors should definitely be investigated for any relationship to the poster, assuming s/he can be identified, and if such a relationship exists, it would seem to be prima facie evidence for a mistrial.


23 posted on 06/10/2024 9:14:45 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

I thought it was posted on another court’s website. I’m not sure because I haven’t seen anything about it since the story came out. We all know this crooked judge will do whatever it takes to sweep this under the rug. He has been completely bias against Trump from the beginning. I don’t see him changing now. I just hope that Trump gets elected again in November so he can take his time paying this clown back for the dirty tactics he used against him.


24 posted on 06/10/2024 9:16:03 AM PDT by Rdct29 (The Democrats Are The New Nazi Party )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

What I want to know is why in the Hell is anybody other than the administrator allowed to post to the New York Supreme Court website, even a comment.

I tried to post an innocent, true, and complimentary comment to a girls Catholic high school facebook page about an experience I had over 50 years ago with a couple of their alumni, and the Admin blocked it. Well, good for them. Why doesn’t the NYSSC have at least that level of security?


25 posted on 06/10/2024 9:19:17 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Yeah the whole thing is just really weird


26 posted on 06/10/2024 9:26:04 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SteelPSUGOP

I think i saw there were two similar posts, the day before the verdict. One of them specifically said that his cousin told him Trump was getting convicted TOMORROW.
That’s not the one the media ran with.


27 posted on 06/10/2024 9:28:31 AM PDT by desertsolitaire (Perhaps the Great Ape Lawgiver in the series Planet of the Apes was correct in his view of humans?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

“ Not much faith in Trump’s legal team.”

What?

You have faith in this New York court? Wow


28 posted on 06/10/2024 9:30:35 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg
Not much faith in Trump’s legal team.

Are you saying if Trump had a better legal team he might have been acquitted? Surely you understand this was a Stalin-like show trial and Trump never had a chance?
29 posted on 06/10/2024 9:37:08 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Victor

I have no first hand knowledge on this, but I can speculate.

My belief is that right now the best attorneys that the DNC can buy are working overtime on multiple compelling arguments that will allow the judge to document why this does not rise to the level of a necessary mistrial. Furthermore, you will not hear anything, until that documentation is absolutely bullet proof and turned over by the DNC to the kangaroo court judge.


30 posted on 06/10/2024 9:38:48 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victor

I did some searching and Saturday is the last time any MSM mentioned the story.


31 posted on 06/10/2024 9:39:34 AM PDT by Doctor Congo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
I can imagine that internet forums and chat rooms are filled with ridiculous statements.

But I can't imagine how Merchan would respond to one of those in such a serious way without some initial investigation.

He has to have some awareness that there is a high level of skepticism about the fairness of the trial. And this action by him adds to that. Perhaps he simply doesn't care about the appearance of impropriety. He certainly has done nothing to mitigate it.

32 posted on 06/10/2024 9:43:57 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Victor

HMMMMMM….Funny how it disappeared in A flash! Anything positive or good for Trump gets dismissed lickety-split but if it’s bad, then they continue the narrative until people are choking on it. I say that it did happen, but they’re trying to sweep it under the rug. No judge would be this incredible stupid to forward this bombshell information to the opposite team without verification ….that would be in itself a mistrial of judgment and justice. I think it really happened but they’re trying to hide the truth.


33 posted on 06/10/2024 9:53:28 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Oh and by the way….this was posted on the corrupt FACEBOOK which probably would take some pulling of teeth to get the identification of the poster’s info. And if it did happen, they’re gonna drag this baby until they sentence Trump then they’ll release the true identity of the connection of this person and the juror. Or it well could be that the juror might be the poster! But something stinks.


34 posted on 06/10/2024 9:58:33 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

You do realize anything governmental in nyc is communist run and this was a show trial right?


35 posted on 06/10/2024 10:07:41 AM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Victor

Can I propose an alternate conspiracy theory?

The NY State Supreme court looked at the whole trial and the backlash and basically came to the conclusion that this who effort was a mistake and needs to go away.

So they put together an easy “out” via the mistrial path. IOW, get rid of this before we have to rule against the judge.


36 posted on 06/10/2024 10:21:12 AM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victor

Some idiot who craves attention

The story is more gaslighting if anything


37 posted on 06/10/2024 10:51:36 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

You don’t get a mistrial once a verdict is reached. Trump’s lawyers are preparing their appeal. If they succeed there may be a new trial, but not before then. Should that come to pass, it won’t be this year.


38 posted on 06/10/2024 11:11:56 AM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The Supreme Court in NYS is a trial court and not the highest state court, or court of last resort, the Court of Appeals is, I believe. Also, Judge Merchan is an acting justice of the NYS Supreme Court, though I’m not sure that is the capacity in which he heard the case.


39 posted on 06/10/2024 12:21:37 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Victor

If true, it would be grounds for a mistrial that even Merchan couldn’t decline. So it has to have been more to the story.


40 posted on 06/10/2024 12:24:27 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson