[edwinland]

The court did not “rule” that they are not vaccines. They stipulated the plaintiffs excellent arguments for the purpose of showing what the plaintiffs “might” show at trial.

[Socon-Econ]

The court did not “rule” that they are not vaccines. They stipulated the plaintiffs excellent arguments for the purpose of showing what the plaintiffs “might” show at trial.
*********
Correct — this post is a nothingburger. Anyway, it can be called a vaccine if it produces antibodies, which is what vaccines are supposed to do. The real issue is whether it also has harmful side effects.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Infectious Disease ping – Were the Covid injected vaccines a “preventative cure”, or a medical “treatment” ?
The issue is not a small one, as originally touted, the injections were sold to the public as a preventative,
whereas later they were identified as minimizing symptoms and reducing the need for hospitalization

(From the News Source : “X” ) - Court: mRNA COVID Vaccines Not Vaccines
“The 9th Circuit Court has ruled that mRNA Covid vaccines, developed by Pfizer and Moderna, are not vaccines, which removes their legal liability protection.
This decision has sparked discussions about potential legal actions against these pharmaceutical companies,
with some users expressing skepticism about the vaccines' effectiveness and safety.
The ruling also raises questions about the classification of these shots and their implications for future litigation and public health strategies.”

edwinland :” The court did not “rule” that they are not vaccines.
They stipulated the plaintiffs excellent arguments for the purpose of showing what the plaintiffs “might” show at trial. “

Please note that the source for this article is posted on “X”, formerly known as a social media account on “Twitter”
Please see the posted comments for additional commentary since there is no further corroboration at this time