Greg Kelly: The left is hiding new evidence that could lead to mistrial for Trump

Newsmax ^ | 34 mins ago 6.7.24 | Greg Kelly

[Robert DeLong]

You have still lost, and very early on in this. You have offered nothing to change that.

Sorry, but you are the one that started this discussion. Therefore, you do not get to make the claim without proof.

Not one person will stand with you.

I on the other hand provided a link that proves that the judge himself wrote a letter that confirmed a message was left the day before the verdict was announced, that claims the person leaving the message is the cousin of a juror who told him the jury had convicted Trump and thanked them for their hard work..

So, we know that the claim is true, that a message had been left at the website of the court involved in the trial.

Only Forbes has written an article that says there is no proof that the person leaving the message is related to a juror or that inside information had been shared. As is the case with any case the burden of the case is that they prove without the shadow of a doubt that this did not occur. They cannot use the excuse that there is no evidence to support that someone just guessed the truth.

That doesn't even begin to debunk the case if that is your source.

We do not know your source, because you refuse to divulge it. Your refusal to provide your source only further negates your claim as being BS.

So, either quit wasting everyone's time & provided the proof, or restate that your statement is your opinion and what your opinion is based on.

Are you a lawyer or judge?

I only ask because plenty of people involved in the profession have stated that this puts the case in real jeopardy. Until they can identify the person who made the post, and verify that he knows no one who is a juror.

[Az Joe]

windbag

[Robert DeLong]

Now you are repeating yourself.

Perhaps you think that makes you clever?

But it makes other think you jut fight for the sake of fighting.

What ails you man?

I think for the most part you are an alright person that I agree with far more than I would ever disagree with. But then there are times when you refuse to back up your claim.

Are you just embarrassed that you are being called out, and are afraid to admit that your statement is actually nothing more than your opinion?

If that is the case, you are being ridiculous in keeping this charade going because of some silly pride you might be protecting.

Heck, I make statements that are my opinion, but it is liberating to admit that my statement was my opinion or perhaps even the educated guess of someone I know.

We are all humans here, I believe, and as such we often make statements we believe to be correct even though we have no proof that our statement is a factual statement.

If that is the case just admit it and feel the liberating result. We do not always have to be right. 🙂👍

[Az Joe]

You have no evidence of anything

[Robert DeLong]

Sure I do and it is what was reported, that you said was debunked. Which you refuse to present the proof of your claim that what was presented has been debunked.

[Az Joe]

You have not proven its real

[Robert DeLong]

Oh but I have, you haven’t proven it being debunked though. The only thing I haven’t proven is that it’s not some joker behind it. But then again, you haven’t either. So ether put up or remain silent on the topic. You are more than welcome to provide your opinion, but make it understood that it’s your opinion you are providing.